Sarging online: my advice
I confess to being relatively new to the game, but I am the founder
and manager of a very popular online dating website and thus would
like to share some advice and guidance with you on the topic of
sarging on the internet. I hope people will add their own comments
to this.
Basic points:
Sarging online isn't all that different to sarging in real-life.
The same techniques can be applied, but need tweaking.
In 99% of cases, rather obviously, you're dealing with one-sets,
which means we need to plan our approach carefully.
Lairs:
Broadly speaking, the best places to sarge online fall into two
categories: online networking sites, and online dating sites. There
are pros and cons to each:
Online dating sites:
Pros:
Women are
- already primed to be sarged and are actively looking for
men
- Women are more responsive to your approach
- Women almost always outnumber men
- Women are generally of a higher quality than the men on such
sites, which makes it easy for a well-presented guy to
succeed.
- Women tend to keep their online presence secret, so you can use
the same techniques on lots of women without them finding out
Cons:
- Women tend to be - on the whole - of a lower quality than in
real life. Everyone tries dating sites once, but some women linger
on dating sites because they have an issue somewhere in their life:
either looks, personality or neediness
- The best sites charge to use them
- Dating sites vary significantly in quality and outside of the
big 3 sites the smaller sites have very few members
Online networking sites:
Pros:
- Women are already primed to meeting men
- Embarrasingly easy to approach
Cons:
- Higher male/female bias than dating sites
- Such sites can attract a lot of sleazy, creepy guys which
creates an aura of cynicism amongst the women towards the men
- The popularity of online networking sites means that they are
less intimate than dating websites, which means women tend not to
respond to approaches with such fervour.
1. Best sites to visit
These are just my personal views, so feel free to add your
comments:
MySpace.com
Huge, online networking site - huge US bias but gaining ground in
Europe, particularly the UK. On the plus side, it's easy to search
for targets, but on the down side it sometimes feels frustratingly
kitsch, takes ages to load and it's enormous popularity means that
its members tend not to progress from meeting online to meeting in
real-life.
You search for people under the 'Browse' option (not 'Search') and
then refine it down under the advanced tab.
Facebook.com
The 8th most visited site on the entire web (it is reported), this
is a massive online networking site that has a more professional
focus than MySpace, linking people by university and school. People
tend to log onto it for social recognition rather than to actually
meet people, so it's less effective than MySpace.
Faceparty.com
This, for me, is the best of the three, because it falls halfway
between an online networking site and an online dating website.
Unlike MySpace and Facebook, faceparty.com doesn't have any feature
for listing all your friends publically, which moves the focus from
social proof to personal satisfaction. Easy to search, full of
adventurous women and easy to sarge.
The best of the rest:
Match.com, linkedin.com, datingdirect.co.uk, freedating.co.uk,
adultfriendfinder.com, friendfinder.com.
Basic principles that apply to all sites:
I've found these basic guidelines are appropriate no matter which
site you use:
1. Make your profile stand out.
Say something unusual or interesting about yourself. The standard
TMM rules work here: peacock online either with an outrageous
photo, or an outrageous claim about yourself: For your job, list
Secret Agent, Pimp, or something crazy. If asked to list your
salary, always choose the option that says I'd rather not say'
(targets always think it's confidentially large than embarrasingly
low).
2. Always, always, always add a photo.
If you do, you're guaranteed so much more attention from women. Put
yourself in their uncomfortable high-heel and impractical shoes:
would you want to see a guy whose appearance is unknown? Put your
best photo online.
If you don't want to be seen online or are worried about getting
spotted, try a photo of the back of your head, or something that
shoes your body outline (if you're slim). In all photos, try and
get one with other people surrounding you (social proof).
3. Keep some elements of your profile deliberately
vague
Why list your religion, drinking habits, desire to have children or
living status when you know that people can use these attributes to
narrow their searches? Keep your profile as wide-reaching as
possible without sacrificing your USP (unique selling point).
4. Photos
The same rules for photos apply online as in real life - upload
photos to your site that show off the aspects of your character you
want to reveal. Good ones include exotic holidays, photos
surrounded by lots of friends, party photos...etc. For dating
sites, I would go one further and add an intimate photo of you (not
with a woman) perhaps in an intimate restaurant, candlelit etc.
Show your softer side as a masquerade.
Some site-specific guidelines:
1. Facebook groups
If you have a wingman in real life, use him online. It surprises me
how many people target the online dating sites on their own. Pool
resources and set up facebook appreciation groups for each other.
It's an extension of social proof: create your own network of
friends and build 'The Damage Appreciation Society' or whatever
your name is. People visiting online networking sites will always
want to be with the guy who has a large group of friends. You're
cool, so show it.
Alternatively, vary this theme a little and call your group
something loaded: 'Join this group if you've pulled Damage'
(obviously, don't get your wingmen to join this group: try and
build up online pivots!), 'Damage's groupies' etc. You can think of
better names than I can.
2. Facebook photos and friends
On facebook, other people can include their photos of you on your
profile, but you have to approve them first. Try and be selective
with your friends, since visitors to your profile will invariably
browse them. If all of your friends are male computer scientists
with monobrows and dribble on their chin, don't expect too much
interest.
The basics of an online approach
Online, every word counts - and words can be viewed or read with
different means by different people. For this reason, you need to
be reasonably careful what you say.
I've found that coming up with an abstract question is the best way
forward, just like real-life.
Last night, I experimented on facebook. I sent a message to every 7
or above who was online at the time. Here is the text:
---
Hey! (be direct, and confident)
I need your advice (don't give them a chance to refuse)
Tucked or untucked? (is ambigious, but has a slight sexual
double-meaning)
D.
---
The purpose of this message was to make the targets think, confuse
them a little and also to ensure that their replies were varied
enough to establish which ones weren't worth the effort and which
ones were.
I sent 100 messages to 100 users, 80 of which replied within 10
hours.
Replies will fall into the following categories:
"What? W
- hat are we talking about?" - the target is a thick shit,
unadventurous and can't think laterally. Bin them.
- "Depends what you're talking about" - the target is more
reserved and will be a bit more hard work
- "Untucked/Tucked in, definitely" - You're in, and the target is
open for your response
- "Definitely untucked, untucked looks cool, tight etc..." -
You're in, and your target is game.
If they write too much I believe it suggests they are slightly too
proficient in the online community and are thus less likely to make
the transition from chatting online to meeting in person. In my
view, the best category of response is the third: the target is
curious, open for more but is still grounded in real-life.
If they gave the first response, I don't follow it up.
If they gave the second response, I use something along the
following lines:
'What did you think I was talking about?!' - ever so slight neg,
make her think she was loading her reply with a sexual innuendo and
thus misinterpreting what you said. Always add the '?!' on the end
to convey the fact you're not being entirely serious. Start playing
with her.
The third response is my favourite. I always follow it up
with:
"Untucked/Tucked in? Outrageous! Let's hope I never have to rely on
you for fashion advice!...so, what do you do?"
This is a perfect neg to use and really gets them thinking. The
final question always prompts them into trying to seek reapproval
from you, having received the put-down from you'
If they come back with the fourth situation, this is a chance
for you to get them to sell themselves to you:
"Really? So what makes you qualified to give fashion advice?!

"
Add the wink "

" to make her
realise you're playing with her.
From then on, you should be in. Escalate the conversation using
traditional TMM - if you've executed the openers correctly then
you'll have set the social dynamics for the conversation perfectly:
you will be the one who she must impress. You will hold the power
and she will be the one seeking approval. Use this to your
advantage.
General follow-up comments:
- Never add a kiss "x" to your messages. Supplication is
bad.
- Try to remain mysterious and let the females ask the
questions.
Closing
The time-constraints used in real-life TMM can be used really
effectively online. Always suggest to your conversation partner
that you're very busy (because you have a hi-powered job, lots of
friends, lots of dates - it doesn't matter) and so you don't spend
much time online. If you're always online then women will think
you're desperate. Push and pull - it works well.
When it comes to closing, I prefer this:
"I've got to disappear now, but we should definitely continue this.
I'm not sure when I'll next be online. What's your #?"
From the 100 approaches I made online, I # closed 54 of them, MSN
closed 87 of them and receives offers to meet for over 30. 2 asked
for sex, but in honesty that wasn't because I played the game well
- rather, they were already after that in the first place.
Final comments:
From my experience working in the world of online dating:
There are always pretty girls on sites, but they're just hard to
find.
Don't rule out a girl because she doesn't have a photo, but always
get a photo before you meet someone (unless you just want to
practice).
Some definitions women will use online, and their translations:
- 'bubbly' - fat
- 'curvacious' - fat
- 'cuddly' - fat
- 'larger than life' - fat
- 'BBW' - very fat
- 'my friends say I'm attractive' - unattractive. You're friends
would say that, otherwise they're bad friends'
- 'I'm not bad looking' - I'm average
- 'english rose' - plain
- 'i like romantic evenings in' - slightly needy
- 'not looking for sex' - looking for sex but trying to justify
herself
- Any kind of pre-introduction, i.e. 'So, about me', 'a bit about
me', 'what I'm looking for' - slightly insecure
- 'Message me' - Don't message her. She's overselling
herself.
I think that's about it. It'd be interested to hear other's
experiences of various sites and the techniques/openers they've
been using - also people's views on using wingmen online.
I hope this is of interest.
Damage.