Add bellapria as a contact
|
Find out more about John:
A Waterbury resident, John has had a varied career. He is blogger/editorialist, a media critic, a book reviewer and a short story writer in addition to staying abreast of Conservative issues. |
If only Democrats would just connect the
dots. Do they have to be so stubborn? There is
something they don't accept either it's because Republicans believe
in it or they just don't like the free-market system. What
they don't want to recognize is the way to pay for all their crazy
programs is through increase revenue. You may think, sure
they know that, how could they not? Well they may know it as
the means to an end but they're strategy in getting revenues is
wrong and in the long run at odds in achieving it.
This is what they don't get. Revenue increase
comes when the economy is doing well. It's like a
business. If you need more money you don't increase the price
of your product, you try to get more people to buy it. To get
more people to buy a product lowering the price is essential,
conversely raising prices can lose money. If government taxes
were looked upon in that way it makes sense to lower taxes.
With lower taxes there is more business activity and hence more
revenue. Business grows and so does job growth and therefore
more people paying taxes. All the talk at the time of
Reagan's budget deficits after his mammoth tax decreases flied in
the face of the fact that revenues doubled. Spending
increased, of course, but as the economy grew the deficit was less
and less a percentage of GDP. Could you imagine if a Democrat
were to announce he was going to pay for a whole slew of social
programs through the means of supply side economics? It can
be done. Why they don't jump at the chance is a
mystery.
It could be that they won't acquiesce the arguments of their
rivals. This is likely. Liberal arguments are like cut
and paste nature. Kind of like group-think. Ask what
about supply-side economics and they'll say it was a failure and
make excuses for it's results. Ask more than one and you'll
get same arguments verbatim. They'll sprinkle this with bad
guy companies and crooks as an example of the dangers of
capitalism. Another theory is that economic growth is
antithetical to the mission of liberalism. If people were
doing well what need is there for social programs? This
is a sophisticated view and gives the left more credit than they
deserve. It implies that they do know how economic growth is
achieved and are out to sabotage the process then do things to the
economy to actually make it worse on purpose. It is a cynical
view of liberals painting them as socialist that want to overthrow
capitalism in the long run.
It's much more the case that they are in a loop of
denial. Conservative policies are wrong and that's
that. The left may use jujitsu reasoning in explaining it but
they do believe it. Here's a prediction: a Democrat will come
along and put the pieces together, use the right kind of economics
to grow the economy in order to get social programs funded.
If this were to happen it would mean conservatives would argue not
at the mere expense of a certain program but on a deeper level in
that what does it do to the individual when the fruits of his labor
are taken care of? In other words is liberty necessary when
there is no reward?
Loading...
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
By Ken
Dilanian and Fredreka
Schouten, USA TODAY
Democrats significantly expanded their
hold on the U.S. Senate Tuesday, putting them in stronger position
to help deliver on President-elect Barack Obama's campaign
promises.
They appeared to fall short, though, of the magic 60-vote majority needed to pass bills without Republican support.
Democrats picked up Republican-held seats in Virginia, North Carolina, New Hampshire, New Mexico and Colorado — and they were leading in Oregon and running even in Minnesota. The only Democratic incumbent thought to be in danger, Louisiana Sen. Mary Landrieu, escaped defeat. And Democrats had hopes of unseating Alaska Republican Sen. Ted Stevens, who was convicted of lying on his financial disclosure statements.
FIND MORE STORIES
IN:
Congress
|
Barack Obama |
Texas |
North Carolina |
Minnesota |
Iraq |
John McCain |
Oregon |
New Hampshire |
New Mexico |
Maine |
Medicare |
Harry Reid | George W
Bush |
Joe Lieberman |
Mitch McConnell |
Norm Coleman |
Ted Stevens |
Al Franken |
John Warner | Senate
Republican |
Mark Warner |
Mark Begich |
Mary Landrieu |
Elizabeth Dole |
Chuck Hagel | Sen.
Pete Domenici | Granite
State |
Wayne Allard |
Tom Udall |
Kay Hagan | Shaheen |
Republican-held
|
Republican Sen. John Sununu | Larry
Craig of Idaho | Republican
Jim Gilmore |
Republican Rep. Steve Pearce | Bob
Schaffer | Republican-dominated
But Minority Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky fended off a tough challenge, as did Republican Sen. Saxby Chambliss of Georgia. That meant that if everything broke the Democrats' way, the party would pick up eight seats, a tally that would bring them to 58 or 59 votes, depending on their relationship with Sen. Joe Lieberman of Connecticut, an independent who endorsed Republican John McCain for president. Democrats, who won control of the Senate after the 2006 elections, held a pre-election 51-49 voting majority, including Lieberman. Whatever the final number, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada told USA TODAY that the Senate will become a different place. "It's a lot easier to get two, three or four (Republicans) than it is to get nine. … I feel very good about it," Reid said as the returns started to come in. "We have the two Maine (Republican) senators who are moderates. … We're gonna be fine." He called the outcome "a victory for the American people. It's about stopping the fighting and partisan battles." Incumbents fall With 35 seats up for grabs on a night that promised to reshape the U.S. Senate, Democrats rode a wave of voter discontent with the economy, the Iraq war and President Bush. Republicans who once were considered solid bets for re-election found themselves in tougher-than-expected contests, and some lost. In North Carolina, Democrat Kay Hagan upset Republican Sen. Elizabeth Dole. Democrat Jeanne Shaheen beat Republican Sen. John Sununu in New Hampshire. In Virginia, former Democratic governor Mark Warner won easily over Republican Jim Gilmore in a race to replace retiring Republican Sen. John Warner. In New Mexico, Democratic Rep. Tom Udall beat Republican Rep. Steve Pearce to succeed retiring Sen. Pete Domenici. Democratic Rep. Mark Udall — a cousin of Tom Udall and the son of the late Arizona Rep. Morris "Mo" Udall — defeated former Republican congressman Bob Schaffer for the Colorado seat now held by Republican Wayne Allard. With Shaheen's election, women control a record 17 seats in the Senate. Under Senate rules, 41 senators can block legislation by threatening a filibuster, and Republicans used that tactic a record number of times to stymie Democrats in the past two years. The Senate held 110 votes to cut off debate and move to final passage of a bill in this Congress — nearly twice the previous record, 61, set in 2001-2002. Fifty of those votes failed. Among the bills blocked: A bid to roll back tax breaks for the oil industry and a bill to allow Medicare to negotiate drug prices. Mark Warner's victory means Virginia has two Democratic senators for the first time since 1970. Sen. Jim Webb, who won his seat in 2006, told a packed ballroom at the state Democratic victory party Tuesday night that Warner and other Democratic victors will put the party in a position to pass legislation. "We had 51-49 on a good day when Sen. Lieberman was not out campaigning for John McCain," he said to laughter. "We will now have a Senate that will get things done." Tough year for GOP It was always going to be a tough year for the GOP, if only because 23 of the 35 Senate seats up for election were held by Republicans. That includes five retiring Republicans: Allard of Colorado, Warner of Virginia, Domenici in New Mexico, Larry Craig of Idaho and Chuck Hagel of Nebraska. As the economy worsened and Obama began competing hard in traditionally Republican-dominated states, the climate for Senate Republican incumbents worsened and campaigning turned nasty. •In Minnesota, Republican incumbent Norm Coleman found himself sparring bitterly in the final days with Democrat Al Franken, a comedian, over a last-minute lawsuit filed in Texas that alleged a Coleman donor had funneled $75,000 to the Republican through his wife's business. •In New Hampshire, Shaheen criticized Sununu's vote for the $700 billion financial rescue plan. Shaheen will become the first woman to represent the Granite State in the U.S. Senate. The race was a rematch of their tight 2002 contest, which Sununu won with 51% of the vote. Democrats also were counting on Alaska, where Anchorage Mayor Mark Begich was challenging Stevens, who was struggling to hold on to his seat despite his felony conviction. Contributing: The Associated Press; Andrea Stone in McLean, Va. Share this story:
Yahoo! Buzz
Digg
Newsvine
Reddit
Facebook
What's this?
Guidelines: You
share in the USA TODAY community, so please keep your comments
smart and civil. Don't attack other readers personally, and keep
your language decent. Use the "Report Abuse" button to make a
difference. Read
more.
Comments: (290)
Showing: New: Most recommended!
atsegga
(0 friends,
send message) wrote: 3/5/2009
6:05:07 PM
The Borgen Project has some good info on
the cost of addressing global poverty.
$30 billion: Annual shortfall to end world hunger. $550 billion: U.S. Defense budget
daveNaustin
(9 friends,
send message) wrote: 2/4/2009
8:00:37 PM
Tax cheats and copyright infringers. What
next?
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9652OD01&show_article=1&catnum=8
big
sam
(0 friends,
send message) wrote: 2/3/2009
3:29:54 PM
Democr$ps control Senate, House and
Presidency. First sign of trouble-they blame the Republicans. Won't
take long to find out ether.
jeffeboy2001
(0 friends,
send message) wrote: 1/2/2009
7:19:31 AM
Why is it when Bill Clinton came up with a
little thing called the american dream and empowered Freddie Mac
and Fannie May to give out loans to people who could never pay it
back WHY OH WHY is he not being held accountable
map07pad
(2 friends,
send message) wrote: 12/18/2008
10:38:09 AM
never trust any politicians, they are all
liars and crooks
uncle
meat
(1 friends,
send message) wrote: 12/17/2008
7:31:22 AM
Please, everyone tell your congressional
representatives to STOP Bush from leasing land near our National
Parks to energy companies. Please stop this travesty.
davy515
(0 friends,
send message) wrote: 12/7/2008
4:38:48 AM
Bush and the republican party are one and
the same. The republican party has had it's way for the last eight
years and have fed the public and steady diet of de-regulations and
tax breaks to the wealthy and have been doing so since Reagan and
the fall of Savings and Loans. Its called trickle down however now
republican's just do it without calling it what it is. It's
supposed to make jobs while corporations get tax breaks to move
their business overseas. All of which are Republican ideas. I guess
WMD's and the Iraq war as which caused destabilization of oil cost
are all the responsibility of Bush. Bush legacy is also one of
torture and failed economic policies the Republican Party caused
it's own demise and their trying to blame it on bad PR....
UK
Brad
(0 friends,
send message) wrote: 11/27/2008
4:52:02 PM
Enough already! It is time to back
America's new Leader(s.). That means President Elect Obama and
those that will be serving with him. The rest of the world has been
watching the election with great enthusiasm. After living in the UK
for 30 Years, I can assure you that you have nothing to fear with
Socialism. If America is lucky enough, it may one day be able to
stand proud that it provides true "Freedom of Speech", health care
for all and everything else that comes with working for the good of
others on this planet. The world is truly pleased to see that
American democracy worked well through the election may it prove as
well in backing the newly elected! Don't complain visit other
cultures around the world, don't rely on your TV and Radio
presenters to "Fill you In".
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
About USATODAY.com:
Site Map | FAQ | Contact Us | Jobs with Us | Terms of Service
Privacy Policy/Your California Privacy Right | Advertise | Press Room | Media Lounge | Reprints and Permissions News Your Way:
Mobile
News |
Email News
|
IM
Alerts |
Add
USATODAY.com RSS feeds |
Podcasts
|
Widgets
Partners:
USA WEEKEND | Sports Weekly | Education | Space.com
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loading...
© NextSmallThings 2008 · coolchaser.com · coolchaser.us · url.com

