Comcast's C-TV: Channeling Disney
A new video-on-demand deal is only the beginning of a new era
of cooperation between the cable giant and the Magic Kingdom
by Ronald
Grover
It was the Walt Disney Co.'s (DIS) annual meeting, known for its bouncy music
and armies of costumed characters running through the aisles. For
Robert Iger, Disney's new CEO, the Mar. 10 gathering was also time
to shake up the digital media world. After clicking off the
company's successes, Disney's new top guy unveiled a plan to stream
shows from Disney's ABC network such as Desperate
Housewives and Lost on the ABC Web site. The
Disney faithful, assembled at the Arrowhead Pond in Anaheim,
Calif., cheered. Mickey and Minnie loved it, too.
But across the country, at the Philadelphia headquarters of
Comcast (CMCSA), executives of the cable giant saw new
opportunities dancing in their heads. Comcast's cable customers
already had access to Disney and ABC programming, but Comcast execs
wanted a way to make the shows and movies available to broadband
and video-on-demand (VOD) customers, too. "When we heard that
Disney was going to put Desperate Housewives online
for free, we wanted it for online and VOD as well," says Steve
Burke, Comcast Cable president and the parent company's chief
operating officer.
Iger's announcement—and Comcast's efforts to get the shows for
itself—were just the latest wrinkle in what had become the media
world's longest-running story: when Disney and Comcast would
finally nail down an agreement that would extend the cable giant's
right to carry Disney's ESPN sports channel. The negotiations had
spanned four years, two Disney CEOs, and a nasty hostile takeover
battle in which Comcast bid $66 billion in 2004 to buy Disney.
Online TV Allies
The two sides ultimately reached an agreement, announced on Nov.
21, that covers a broad range of rights, including Comcast's
ability to use some ABC shows for its massive VOD effort as well as
broadband. But that's just part of a far-reaching agreement that
may become the model on which the new media world soon
operates.
Indeed, BusinessWeek.com has learned that within weeks Comcast
is expected to announce a new TV portal, code-named C-TV, that
Disney will help promote through the use of film and TV clips that
Comcast would use online. Down the road, the two companies may work
more closely together to provide ABC, Disney Channel, and other
kinds of programs for the portal as well, according to sources at
both companies.
What's more, Disney is expected to help Comcast test the notion
of showing movies on demand at the same time the movies are
available in DVD stores—effectively shortening the lag time before
cable gets access to those films. It's a development certain to
drive major DVD retailers like Wal-Mart (WMT) nuts. "The deal is all about Comcast
wedging itself into an online content company and using Disney as a
partner to get there," says UBS analyst Aryeh Bourkoff, who follows
both companies.
The notion of the two companies working together would have
seemed far-fetched not that long ago, when venomous barbs flew in
the wake of the 2004 takeover bid. That bid helped seal the fate of
then-Disney CEO Michael Eisner, who resigned a year later and was
replaced by his second-in-command, Iger. But the just-announced
deal that Comcast and Disney struck shows how far the two companies
have come. It represents the change in the media landscape that
content at the click of a button has wrought.
Comcast Gains VOD Muscle
Under pressure in the broadband era from the likes of News
Corp.'s (NWS) MySpace, which already streams TV shows on
its site, and the TV-over-Internet ambitions of telephone companies
such as AT&T (T), Comcast needs to beef up its own broadband
offerings in a jiffy. And Disney, eager to shed its Eisner-era
image of a slow-moving company, has hurried to be the first to
embrace new technologies under Iger, who cut the industry's first
deals to make Disney-produced movies and TV shows available from
Apple's (AAPL) iTunes store.
Still, the deal was no piece of cake for either company. The
epic talks kicked off in 2002, when Comcast insisted on
renegotiating a year-old deal for ESPN that had several years to
run. Why? Comcast had recently purchased AT&T's cable unit,
gaining the size under its existing contract to demand a 10%
discount to the huge price tag that ESPN charges cable operators to
carry its programming. (Kagan Research currently estimates that
cable operators pay $2.91 per subscriber each month for ESPN,
compared to $1.67 for Fox Sports or 89 cents for TNT.) In the end,
Disney, which had been getting an estimated 20% annual hike for the
sports channel, accepted far less—about 7% a year—but also won
several concessions in other areas, including the terms it got for
shows that it will give to Comcast for VOD and broadband use.
The deal almost immediately makes Comcast an even bigger power
in the VOD world. With more than 8,000 programs available each
month—most of them free—Comcast has served up more than 3 million
programs in the last two years, it says, and 1 million in just the
last three moths. Until now, however, Disney was the lone holdout
among major media companies and wasn't providing its programs to
Comcast—despite a must-see lineup that includes not only its
top-rated ABC shows but popular shows from Disney Channel and its
soap-opera channel, SoapNet.
Test to Deliver Movies Sooner
More important from Disney's point of view, the deal gave it
access to more than 24 million Comcast TV subscribers and another
11 million high-speed Internet customers. Disney intends to sell
ads for most of its shows. (Disney reported that it had streamed
more than 11 million episodes of Lost, Desperate
Housewives, and other shows in the first month the ABC site
was up and running). Disney sells ads for those streams, but to
make sure, it got a guarantee from Comcast to cover a minimum
amount of ad sales of the ABC shows.
Even more interesting is where the agreement goes from here.
Disney has told Comcast it is willing to participate in a test in
two markets, in which it would offer movies on demand three or four
months after the movies show up in movie theaters—the same time
DVDs are shipped to retailers such as Wal-Mart. Disney has already
ruffled feathers among retailers like Wal-Mart and Target (TGT) by offering its movies on Apple's iTunes
site at prices that the large retailers believe are below their
wholesale price (see BusinessWeek, 9/11/06, "The
Empire Strikes Back"). But this could send folks to Comcast
instead of Wal-Mart to buy the DVDs. For Iger, who has said he
wants to experiment with narrowing the "windows," it is a toe in
the water.
For Comcast, Disney presents a formidable ally in taking on
telcos and others in the battle to deliver movies and TV shows over
the Internet. C-TV, the new TV portal due in the coming weeks, is
expected to help consumers organize their videos—be they
consumer-generated or shows that they have streamed or downloaded
from other sites. But down the road, Comcast wants to make episodes
of TV shows available online, giving it the ability to offer
custom-made channels for shows like Lost or
Desperate Housewives. ABC hasn't agreed to that, but
the lines of communication are open since both companies are eager
to experiment in the broadband world, according to sources with
knowledge of the deal.
Getting the Deal Done
So how did these two companies get so chummy after their
knock-down, drag-out takeover battle in 2004? Part of it is the
practicalities of doing business—ESPN still needed Comcast's
subscribers to sell advertising for its sports shows while Comcast
would likely see some of its subscribers flee to satellite if it
didn't carry Monday Night Football games on the
channel. But the partnership owes as much to the diplomatic skills
of new CEO Iger, who has charmed onetime adversaries like Apple CEO
Steve Jobs, who clashed repeatedly with former CEO Eisner. At one
point in the talks, Iger made available to Comcast ESPN's
high-definition coverage of the World Cup soccer games, which
Comcast used to market to new subscribers.
Moreover, Iger and Burke were friends before Burke left Disney
in 1998 for Comcast. And, while the two didn't talk during the
takeover battle, they reconnected soon after Iger became Disney CEO
at the annual Allen & Co. media conference, where they went
fly-fishing at Idaho's Salomon River. There they talked about the
deal's hard-to-negotiate details. And when the talks bogged down,
says Burke, Iger would step in to get stalled talks back on track.
"Whenever there was a deadlock, Bob was the guy we went to," says
Burke, "and he was always a voice of reason."
Where will this deal take Comcast and Disney? Hard to tell.
Comcast has all kinds of plans. Someday it wants to be able to show
first-run movies to its customers—maybe for $30 a pop—the same day
that they play in movie theaters. Iger has ruminated in the past
that perhaps it will happen that way, and was promptly excoriated
by major theater owners. Don't expect to see Pirates of the
Caribbean III playing at a Comcast system near you anytime
soon. Still, for a pair of companies that were once at each other's
throats, their recent chumminess is remarkable. And it may end up
profoundly changing the media world.
Grover is Los Angeles
bureau chief for BusinessWeek.
grate article, my speed is faster
Left by smitty on December 9th, 2006
no it’s not.
This claim is false. See:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/316666
Left by Informed user on December 9th, 2006
Read the whole artile you just linked to Informed. He is right, if Windows Update decides to kick in or any other program that Microsoft has decided is a priority, that program will get an automatic 20%.
Perhaps Mywill could have better explained that this is not a constant occurance, but it is none the less a “Feature” of Windows that many users might find undesireable.
Left by Informed User with Reading Comprehension Skills on December 9th, 2006
This WILL jack up your computer. Applications that require a certain level of bandwidth, say for example streaming video, will no longer be able to reserve that bandwidth to keep things moving smoothly. So normal web browsing has the potential to steal the bandwidth from an application that requires it. If you REALLY need to allocate all your bandwidth to a download, just don’t be streaming video or running other applications that require a certain quality of service amount of bandwidth while you are downloading which I assume most people are smart enough to do on their own.