Look Out Wikipedia, Here Comes Yahoo
Answers!
By Danny Sullivan
We
wrote last month of
Yahoo Answers hitting the 10 million answers posted mark, an
impressive accomplishment especially given the low interest and
poor take-up answer search has
traditionally had in the US. But some new stats add fuel to the
idea that Yahoo Answers is not only bucking the trend but perhaps
becoming a social interacting phenomenon like YouTube or
MySpace.
Of
course, Yahoo already has some social successes of its own: the
photo sharing site
Flickr and the bookmarking sharing service of
del.icio.us. But both of those services came through
acquisitions, rather than internal Yahoo mojo kicking in.
Yahoo Groups is a large, thriving service, but even that
ultimately was an acquisition.
In
contrast,
Yahoo MyWeb was Yahoo's first big internally-built push to tap
into social networking and especially to apply it to search. To
date, MyWeb has hardly seemed a social phenomenon, though my
article on Tuesday --
Yahoo MyWeb Gets New Look, Easier Browsing & Viewing
Features -- did explain how Yahoo says the popularity is better
than you might see from afar. Plus, the new changes to make that
service more accessible may help it grow.
Still, MyWeb hasn't felt as if a community has rapidly swelled
underneath the service. In contrast, Yahoo Answers gives exactly
that impression. After the 10 million answers announcement caught
my attention, Yahoo trotted it out again as a sign of success at
the company's analyst day that
I attended last month, saying growth was strong.
I
wondered what a third party had to say about the popularity of
Yahoo Answers. So I shot off a quick email to Bill Tancer at
Hitwise during the event, who sent back some metrics that made
everyone at Yahoo smile when I showed them in a separate meeting
after the event had ended. Bill's since updated those figures for
me, as I've been delayed in doing this write-up. Let's dive into
them, then we'll look at the service itself more after
that.
Get
ready to go behind the scenes at Google with "Inside
AdSense," the official Google AdSense blog and news source.
Visit
http://www.google.com/adsenseblog/ today and subscribe
to receive "Inside AdSense" by e-mail, offering you the
latest
news and expert optimization tips to help boost your revenue.
So, stay in touch! Go to
http://www.google.com/adsenseblog/
now and learn how to make Google AdSense work for
you.
|
Interested in placing your TEXT AD HERE?
Click Here
Impressive Growth
Here's the growth since Yahoo Answers launched in December,
contrasted against the far more established
Google Answers service:
In
terms of sheer numbers, comparing Yahoo Answers to something like
YouTube will seem laughable. As of June 3, Yahoo Answers attracted
only 0.044 percent of the internet audience. In terms of growth,
the line is impressive. People are definitely taking notice of the
service and jumping in.
How
about another third party? Here are some comScore
figures:
You'll see two lines above. Visitors shows the millions of
surfers in the US who visited the service at least once in a given
month. It's going up, up, up. And in contrast to Hitwise, the other
line suggests that a good chunk of the US surfing population IS
making use of the service. That line shows the percentage of all US
home, work or college internet surfers who went to the service at
least once in a month. If I've done the math right (and I
double-checked several times), in April, this was a huge chunk for
a new service, 4 percent. Please note the chart says % OF ALL WEB
VISITS -- THAT's VISITORS
Bear in mind that the comScore figures don't reflect usage. A
single person clicking into Yahoo Answers once in a month counts
the same as someone who goes in every day. Yahoo's heavily
promoting Yahoo Answers, so getting those initial clicks isn't
surprising. Still, it's another sign that there's something to
watch here.
The
Hitwise stats above showed how Yahoo Answers is massively growing
compared to Google Answers. But here's another look against peers.
Hitwise has a category called Education/Reference, headed up by the
popular
Wikipedia site. Stats as of the week ending May 13,
2006:
Notice that Yahoo Answers, only a few months old, is now
number three on the list. Even more remarkable is that it comes
above Answers.com, which provides the definition links on Google.
Those likely drive lots of traffic to Answers.com but apparently
not more than Yahoo Answers is now generating.
My
headline for this article, "Lookout Wikipedia, Here Comes Yahoo
Answers!," is admittedly hyped. Yahoo Answers has a healthy 3
percent share, but Wikipedia remains well above at 17 percent of
web visits to sites in this category.
In
addition, the Wikipedia stats almost certainly don't include the
many sites that are powered by Wikipedia but which use their own
domains. Similarly, Answers.com might have related domains not in
this rollup. You can expect that Bill will likely follow up on my
story to explore this more. He loves to get his teeth into stats
like this, so watch
his blog.
Shoot-Em-Up Answering Community
Aside from traffic, I think the more interesting comparison
between Yahoo Answers and Wikipedia is the different approaches.
Wikipedia aims to have everyone comprehensively build a corpus of
knowledge in an organized fashion. Yes, disorganized in the sense
that anyone can change things. But organized in that each topic
gets a single page containing the contributions.
Yahoo Answers deals with one-off question answering. There's a
corpus of knowledge growing there, one that's even organized into
categories, but all the answers on a particular topic aren't neatly
put on the same page.
That's not necessarily a disadvantage. In fact, it may be part
of the reason Yahoo Answers is pulling in an audience that might
never want to contribute to Wikipedia. Wikipedia, if it were a
computer game, would be a strategy game where you take a long view
to win a campaign or goal. Yahoo Answers is a first-person
shoot-em-up. Questions appear, and as soon as one is shot down with
an answer, it's on to the next one.
That's addictive. I know first hand, because after spending
some time on Yahoo Answers, I found myself oddly compelled to
"play" in the game. But playing's hard in that many of the open
questions I found of interest seemed to have already been answered.
The community is not only growing -- it's fast!
Need more proof of addiction? Check out the
AnswerholicsAnonymous site, where Yahoo Answers junkies talk
about solving their addiction. Or look at the relatively new
leaderboard. I found it fascinating to read the
FAQ of June Furrows, who until recently had answered more than
anyone else and reached the top "Level Seven" status. But she's not
along -- there are a page full of sevens and plenty of other high
rankers.
60
Days FREE ONLINE ADVERTISING with Best of the Web!
Put your business in front of targeted customers with
The Internet's oldest directory, BOTW.org - Since 1994
Direct-link text ads are prominently featured at the top of
Directory categories and alongside BOTW search results
Free Advertising - No Obligation. No Charges. No Kidding.
Visit
http://botw.org/Free to start your FREE TRIAL
today!
|
Interested in placing your TEXT AD HERE?
Click Here
Using The Service
Let's dive into using the service itself from a searcher
perspective. It's crucial to understand that Yahoo Answers is far
from being just about answers. Part of the reason I think the
service is growing and is so compelling is that it is a different
type of discussion forum. People ask about things not to get
answers but instead just to talk.
For
example, I did a drill down in the
Other United Kingdom category. I live in an area of the UK
without its own section of Yahoo Answers, so this seemed a good
place to go and find questions that I might be able to
answer.
Why do some people think that English is a race rather than a
Nationality..? caught my eye, mainly to see what the range of
opinions would be. There's not going to be an exact answer to this.
This is a good case of Yahoo Answers being a place for discussion
rather than giving that one actual "correct" answer.
What Is Your Favorite Punk Rock Band from the Music area is yet
another case where Yahoo Answers operates as a message board,
rather than something like Wikipedia.
You've also got ridiculous questions, which can make it easy
to dismiss the usefulness of the service.
What day is it on June 13th this year at 5pm in London? is an
example of this. I mean, c'mon -- you can't find a calendar
yourself?
These types of questions feel like they dominate the Yahoo
Answers home page, which may cause a serious searcher to dismiss
Yahoo Answers, as I've explained. But these same questions are
likely the type of discussions pulling people into the community.
And beyond them, there are the real questions that are being
answered.
How do I format an address on an envelope to United Kingdom from
the US and how many stamps? struck home for me, as I've often
been asked about this by friends and family posting to me from the
UK.
I
explained my method in the post above. Others also explained they
address mail as I do, while some had slightly different advice. But
was there an exact answer?
A
Google
search led me to this page of
advice, which in turn pointed at the Royal Mail's official
guidelines. And those, while they outline certain address
elements you must have, don't cover the exact lines they go on or
format to use.
So
much for an exact answer -- but also, perhaps that's a good sign of
Yahoo Answers shining. It may help make it clear there's no one
correct way, which might save someone from endlessly searching for
one.
I found a number
of questions involving distances, such as
What is the distance between cambridgeshire and Wiltshire in the
UK? Again, this resonated with me. I've had plenty of US
visitors ask me this. Yes, you could go to a map and figure it out.
That's what I did for this question, when answering. But it's the
sort of thing you also just like to ask someone about.
The questions
I've covered so far were "open" when I looked at them -- actively
letting people post answers. Eventually, open questions become
"unresolved," as you'll see
here, where no new answers can be contributed. Instead, people
get to vote on what's been given already.
What is the name of money people in the United Kingdom use? is
currently an undecided question, where votes were being taken. The
answer is the pound, of course. Many said this. One went with the
more formal "pound sterling" answer, which made me think yes --
that would be better. But is it? Wikipedia
backs that. So does the
BBC and the
Encyclopedia Britannica. Plus, that person mentioned "quid"
being slang for the pound in the way "buck" is slang for a US
dollar. It got my vote.
After voting
closes, a question is considered resolved, as you'll see
here.
What is the +44 when calling the UK? How do I call the UK from
America? is an example of a resolved question. In this case,
the "best" answer according to the voting was correct, but I though
the second answer advising "Dial 011-44 plus the rest of the
number" was better. Given the info provided by the question, it was
the easiest one to act upon (and a question I answer all the time
for those trying to reach me).
Unfortunately,
once voting is closed, you can't influence the answers any more or
add to them. I find that somewhat unfortunate. Some of these
questions probably should be reopened to voting and getting better
answers. In addition, you can see there are a lot of the same
questions being asked and answered. It's wasteful of time. But then
again, pick any discussion forum. That exact type of
ask-answered-ask again activity goes on and on.
How about
actually asking questions, rather than giving answers? I did two
last month.
What stores have Xbox 360s available in Seattle? was one. Two
gave me general answers, but no one definitely told me the place to
go.
"Is a US Xbox 110
volts only or 110/220 switchable?" was one that got removed, so I
can't point you at it, but you can still see it cached in Google
here. No question got any votes. That doesn't surprise me. None
of them really answered my question.
As it turns out,
I eventually got the answer myself, when I went to Target, bought
one, opened it up and found out that it is 110 only. That made for
a quick return (I've now
returned the Xbox 360 on two continents). But while I now had
the right answer, there was no way for me to get that answer back
into my own question and help others.
In Conclusion
I'd
been pretty dubious about the chances of Yahoo Answer and answer
search in general, as I
wrote before. I was definitely wrong in the case of Yahoo
Answers. The growth is stunning. As I've explained, I think it's
that new twist of not just being about the correct answers but
being a discussion area that's making it compelling. Clearly, it's
a service to keep watching.
You'll be hearing more about it. Yahoo's trumpeting the
success far and wide, as they did at their analyst day last month.
Yahoo embraces man over machine from Bambi Francisco at
Marketwatch is one example of that spin paying off and another good
read on Yahoo Answers, diving in especially more in how Yahoo's
experience with answer search in Taiwan paid off and moved them to
try more in the US.
Market Scan Does 'Yahoo! Answers' Have The Answer? from Forbes
out earlier this week is another example, spurred on by an
investment group reporting that Yahoo Answers seems
positive.
Aside from hearing more about Yahoo Answers, expect you'll
likely see a revitalization of answer search in general. MSN's
already
got one in beta.
Answerbag just popped up on my radar and will have new features
later this month. And yes, I expect to go back and see what the
deal is with Google Answers. I did ask briefly via email if there
was any comment on the growth of Yahoo Answers compared to Google's
service but didn't hear back, so I plan to do a
follow-up.
|