The Very Venerable Yongey Mingyur Rinpoche
Meditation and Non-meditation Talk Two
Halifax Shambhala Center, Nova Scotia Canada, January 28,
2004
Translator: Tyler Dewar
Transcriber: Barbara Blouin
Editor: Judith Smith
Good evening, everyone.
Shamatha
Tonight we will continue discussing shamatha [Skt.], or
calm-abiding meditation. Shamatha is the first type of meditation
we engage in when we embark on the path of meditation. As we
discussed yesterday, in Tibetan, shamatha is translated as
shi-ne.
The first syllable, shi, means to pacify - meaning to
pacify the mind over which we have no control or freedom - this
wild mind that behaves like a crazy monkey, creating problems where
there are no problems. This monkey-like mind that we have is
ordinarily present with us throughout our day-to-day lives. It is
good if we recognize this monkey-like, very wild mind. The worst
situation to be in is not even knowing that the mind is behaving
like a monkey. If we do not recognize this monkey-like mind, then
the phenomenon of creating problems where there are no problems,
and creating tasks where there are no tasks, becomes greater and
greater.
How is it that this wild mind causes problems for us? It causes
problems through fixation and being too tight. We could use the
example of looking at our face in a mirror. There is nothing wrong
with our face to begin with but, because of our tight fixation, we
end up making problems with our face, looking for and creating
faults. That type of fixation causes greater and greater
suffering.
There are three levels to this fixation: coarse, subtle and very
subtle fixation. In meditation we begin to work with the coarse
level of fixation first.
The syllable ne in shi-ne means "to abide" or "to rest" -
to gain freedom or self-control over our mind.
The method we use to gain such freedom is to rest our mind in
its own nature by way of mindfulness. If we are able to practice a
mindfulness that is harmonious with the nature of our mind, then we
will eventually gain control over our mind.
Shamatha Without Object
In terms of resting the mind naturally, I spoke last night about
"shamatha without object" or "shamatha without attributes." During
this type of shamatha, we relax our body and we relax our mind in
its natural state, just as if we were relaxing after having done
two hours of exercise, or having done a very hard job. We tire
ourselves out, and then we relax completely. That is how we rest in
this first type of shamatha.
Shamatha without object is so easy that we don't trust it, and
so for beginners we need something that is a little bit difficult -
the practice of shamatha with object. Whether we're practicing
shamatha with object or shamatha without object, we should simply
have the attitude that we are going to try our best. We don't have
to hold our mind tightly thinking, "It is absolutely not okay if I
do not have a good meditation session."
Relaxation
We should think: "If my meditation is good, let it be good. If
my meditation is bad, let it be bad. If it is mistaken, let it be
mistaken. If it is correct, let it be correct. If I am to be reborn
in hell, let me go to hell. If I'm to be reborn in a Pure Land, let
me be go to a Pure Land." The time of meditation is precisely this
state of being free from cares. We shouldn't be that
carefree in our post-meditation stage, but when we meditate, we
should definitely be as carefree as that.
Once when I was traveling from Delhi to the West, I met up with
a Western person in the Delhi airport. The Westerner asked "Do you
meditate?" And I said, "Yes, I do."
I returned the question, "Do you meditate too?" and he said,
"Meditation is too hard for me. As soon as I meditate, about ten
minutes pass, I start to feel dizzy, and like I'm about to vomit"
[laughter]. Then I said, "If it is like that for you, then it must
be a sign that you are not relaxing enough. So you need to relax
more." He said, "Forget about that! The more I relax, the worse I
get. The more I relax, the more dizzy I get."
I asked him, "Do you have a meditation teacher?" He said, "No,
I'm reading everything from books."
I said, "Well, sit down here and meditate, and I'll watch you."
The Westerner said, "Very good, I will."
So he sat down on a chair and started meditating.
[Rinpoche mimicked the person meditating - people laughed for a
long time.]
He was just like that, with his body shaking and his eyes really
tense and his lips pursed.
I said, "Okay, that was okay. Now I'll meditate, and you watch
me." He said, "Good idea," and I sat down. The Westerner looked me
up and down, head to feet, and then back up to the top of my head
again. After a few minutes the Westerner said, "You're just sitting
there!"
I replied to him, "Meditation is pretty much just sitting. It is
just resting with your mind in whatever its nature is."
Then some announcements were made over the P.A. system in the
airport, and that meant both us had to leave for our respective
gates. The first leg of my flight from Delhi landed in Frankfurt. I
got off the plane and went into the Frankfurt airport, and saw the
same Westerner getting out of his plane. He approached me and said,
"I was just sitting on my plane ride just like you were doing in
Delhi, and I didn't get dizzy. So I think you have the right
method. I think I got something from it."
Meditation is just sitting, just relaxing with our mind, with
whatever nature it has. Our mind has a nature that we cannot label
saying it is this or it is that. But at the same time, its nature
is relaxed.
Meditation With Taste and Smell
In terms of shamatha with object, we discussed last night
about meditating using forms and sounds as objects of meditation.
We will continue with that explanation, starting off with smells,
using whatever smells that are occurring as a support for our
meditation - pleasant smells and unpleasant smells. Perfume,
incense - whatever it is. It is the same as forms and sounds. We
can look at whatever forms are in front of us, and when we are
using sounds, we listen to whatever sound is resounding at the
time.
Smells are something that are perceived by our nose, and when we
do shamatha with smells, we simply guide our mind to perceive the
smells as well - we look at the smells with our mind, but that is
all. We do not need to visualize smells, or try to meditate on the
smell in any special way. We simply bring our attention to the
smell, with our mind being aware of the smell.
It is the same with taste. We can take any taste as our object
of our meditation - sweet, sour, bitter, spicy - whatever it is.
When we eat food, our tongue faculty perceives the taste. In order
to practice meditation, we merely bring our attention to it and
have our mind merely notice the taste. That is all.
If you go into a retreat sometime, you should prepare very nice
food for your meals. If your dharma friends ask you why you are
putting so much effort into your food on retreat, that you should
be spending most of your time practicing, you can just tell them,
"That i's my meditation. I just eat tasty food."
If your friends then ask, "How is it going to help you to just
eat food all day long in retreat," you can simply say, "That is my
practice"
[laughter].
Just joking!
Meditation With Sensations
The fifth meditation is tangible objects or tactile sensations.
From among all the five senses, the tactile sensations are the best
to use with meditation.
Tactile sensations include headaches, backaches, leg pains, knee
pains - everything like that. Being hot, cold, hungry, overstuffed,
thirsty; having a toothache, being dizzy, feeling heavy - all of
these are tactile sensations.
When we have a strong toothache, our mind helplessly becomes
focused constantly on it. We do not have any control over it. If we
try to eat a tasty meal, our mind doe not pay much attention to
that; it is on our toothache. If we try to go out for a walk or try
to play some sports, to refresh ourselves, or go out to watch a
movie, that doesn't help too much because all we can think about is
our toothache.
What is the main helper for this toothache all along? It is our
own mind, thinking, "This toothache is terrible, this toothache is
hurting me. When will I be free from this toothache?" Here we have
hope and fear both: fear of the toothache harming us and hope for
the toothache going away. These continuous thoughts in our mind
make the toothache stronger and then the pain gets greater and
greater.
But if we bring this toothache to our shamatha meditation
practice, we can place our attention on the pain. Where is this
pain happening? The pain is a feeling experienced in our mind. We
do not look at the tooth itself; we look at the pain that we are
experiencing in our brain.
If we look directly at the pain in this way, we will genuinely
experience nondistraction.
Usually our mind is naturally distracted by the pain. So if we
intentionally direct our attention toward the pain, there already
will be a strong support for nondistraction. When we place our
attention on the pain one-pointedly in this way, the pain does not
go away but it will be a different pain than before. There will be
a vivid sense of pain and, at the same time, a vivid sense of
well-being and of joy. Thoughts like, "This pain is bad. I need to
be free from this pain, I wish this pain would go away" will
dissolve. So this is a very good opportunity to both improve our
practice of mindfulness, and to help ourselves because we are not
increasing our own pain.
We will do this practice together using tactile sensations -
sore legs, sore backs or sore bums from sitting on the cushions. If
you do not have any particular tactile sensation, you could create
one.
Squeeze your hand in between your thumb and your index finger.
Chinese doctors say that this helps headaches and stomach aches, so
you should squeeze hard enough so that it hurts. The pain that you
are creating is a feeling and so it exists in the mind. Look at
that feeling one pointedly. Do not be distracted from that feeling,
that sensation. We will meditate like this together now.
First, sit in meditation posture, with your mind relaxed, and do
shamatha without object for a little while. Then create a tactile
sensation and look at it. Sit with your mind relaxed.
[All meditate together.]
Meditation With Thoughts
If you understand this meditation-without-object technique, you
will attain Buddhahood very quickly. Maybe in two or three days
[laughter]. It is a very profound meditation but there is nothing
special about it.
Our biggest obstacle in meditation is the movement of thoughts -
thoughts of desire, aggression, ignorance, jealousy and so on.
There are all kinds of movement in our minds - we usually think of
these thoughts as getting in the way of our meditation and harming
or destroying our meditation.
But if we understand the key points of meditation, then those
very thoughts actually will be support for our meditation and will
not harm our meditation at all. It is the same as how forms become
support for our meditation.
Thoughts are any type of thought: negative thoughts of mental
afflictions - desire, jealousy, anger and things like that;
positive thoughts about helping others or thoughts of love; neutral
thoughts, like "I want to eat" or "I want to stay here" or "I want
to go for a trip around Halifax" or something like that.
Any of these thoughts can become a support for our meditation
simply by looking at our thoughts. It is just like looking at forms
and listening to sounds.
When we meditated on tactile sensations and brought sound into
our meditation, they became supports for our nondistraction. They
helped us to maintain undistracted mindfulness. In the very same
way when we look at our thoughts, they help us to be undistracted
in our meditation.
There are two different basic states that our minds could be in:
stillness and movement. There is no third category for beginners on
the path of meditation; there is no state of mind they could
experience that is not stillness or movement.
The technique of using thoughts as the support for our
meditation relates with the state of mind when it is moving.
So it is important to know that we do not have to look at one
thought alone, we simply look at whatever thoughts are arising. For
example, thoughts are like this rosary or mala - one thought comes
after the other after the other after the other after the other.
Our mind usually operates like that, but when we do not look at
thoughts, we are not aware of the process. We should look at them
now.
Mindfulness is like my right hand, and the thoughts are like the
mala. The mala is being pulled, bead-by-bead, by the right hand. In
the same way, we look with our mindfulness at all of our thoughts.
So our thoughts will not remain occupied with one thought because
our minds are like wild monkeys. We will be filled with thoughts.
We'll be thinking, "I need to eat something, I need to drink
something, I need to go here and do this, and I need to stay here
and do that," and that is absolutely fine. We can just observe all
of it.
As we look at our thoughts in this way, even a hundred thousand
thoughts, that means you have a hundred thousand supports for
meditation. That is very good. The thoughts themselves become a
support for holding our mind.
[Brief meditation.]
Questions
Question: Rinpoche, is it necessary to label your thoughts, or
is awareness simply looking at a movement or hearing a sound?
Rinpoche: The most important point about it is recognizing that
we are having a thought. But it is fine to use a label as a
technique for doing that, because our mind does not work without
labels. The entire work of this mind, the sixth consciousness, the
mental consciousness that we are working with, is to join words and
meanings, join words and the things to which they refer and cling
to them as being the same thing. So to use the label would be fine,
because that is how this mind operates.
When we work with shamatha with object, there is a subject and
an object, a viewer and viewed, a sense of duality, so the labeling
process is fine. The looker/viewer is mindfulness, and the object
being looked at is our thoughts. There is a quote from a Buddhist
text that says, "Through relying on focus, the state of nonfocus
excellently arises," and that is what is being pointed to here.
Q: I noticed yesterday with the practice we did looking at a
small object, that the mind would see the object, and then it would
sort of fade out, like bad reception on a TV set, and come back in.
Today, when doing the sort of physical negative-pain practice, the
same quality would happen: even though you wouldn't like the pain,
the mind would fade out and come back in the same way. Then when
doing the thought-watching practice, the contrast wasn't as sharp.
So that when there was sight, versus sort of foggy sight, going
back and forth, and pain ...
Translator: Did the thoughts get replaced by sense
perceptions?
Q: Yes.
Rinpoche: It is fine if the thoughts get replaced by a sense
perception. When we are working with this mental consciousness, our
main object is whatever appears to the mental consciousness.
Usually in a special sense, what appears to mental consciousness is
thoughts, but of course our mental consciousness can also focus on
any of the five sense perceptions. If we are not having thoughts,
but what is appearing more clearly is a form or a sound, then that
is fine - we can focus on that.
Q: Does the practice mean that you just indulge in thoughts with
the mindfulness? For me, it was more that you produce more and more
thoughts and just stay with the train of the thoughts, and actually
the more they come up, the better that is?
Rinpoche: The technique that we are practicing now is not about
producing thoughts or creating thoughts, but rather looking at
thoughts if they arise, recognizing that thoughts have arisen. This
recognition is mindfulness. It is looking at what is happening in
the mind, what the mind is thinking. "Oh, it's thinking about my
house now. Oh, it's thinking about the city now," and so on.
Q: So, is it that when there are not so many thoughts you are
more into the sense perceptions, or what you said before?
Rinpoche [laughs]:
We'll discuss a little later what you do when there are no
thoughts,
Q: Thank you.
Q: When I was trying to relax my mind during meditation, that's
when I would be thinking a lot of thoughts. And when I was trying
just to think thoughts, I didn't really have any thoughts
[laughter].
Rinpoche [laughs]: Okay. We'll talk about that later too
[laughter].
Q: Earlier when you were talking about meditation, the first
translation came that it is a way to "control the mind," and then
it changed to "hold the mind." The transmission that most of us
received from Trungpa Rinpoche was that controlling the mind was
the problem, and he very much encouraged us to allow space for
things to arise and dissolve. So I just want to clarify what you
mean - could you comment on controlling the mind or holding the
mind?
Rinpoche: With respect to the choice of words there, "control"
has more of a sense of fabrication than "hold" does, a sense of
contrivance to it. So that is why "hold" is a little bit
better.
As to the general meditation technique that Trungpa Rinpoche
presented, that was more connected to shamatha without object. The
main instruction was to allow thoughts to arise and allow thoughts
to depart. Whereas the particular technique that we have been
discussing is slightly different: It is to look at the thoughts and
use the thoughts that arise as the support for mindfulness. In this
context, it is best if thoughts arise; it is slightly preferable if
thoughts arise. If more thoughts arise, then that is number one for
this particular technique.
We'll practice together again. This time, if you do not have any
thoughts, make them. Make many thoughts quickly, clearly. There are
three qualities to this technique: quickly, many and clearly. But
there's one important point: You have to look at every single one.
Don't let one thought go by without being looked at. The looking is
important.
[All practice.]
Q: Rinpoche, although that seemed a little fabricated, there was
a sense of moving the mind quickly, like scanning a television
screen. Actually, the eyes move too.
Rinpoche: The fabricated or the contrived part that you referred
to is fine, because we are working with shamatha with object, and
when you do this meditation technique, there is always going to be
some fabrication. As was said before, through relying on a focus,
the state of nonfocus excellently arises.
We'll talk about your second point, scanning the TV screen, a
little bit later.
Q: Rinpoche, as someone who has been trying to get rid of
thoughts for thirty years, it was interesting to dredge them up
from where they had been hiding. It was almost like shining a
spotlight on them one at a time - spotlight, then rest in the next
one, spotlight on that one. It was almost like a cartoon cat that
sticks his finger in a plug and gets all fuzzy. These thoughts
didn't really go anywhere, they sort of got nailed, or paralyzed,
somehow.
Rinpoche: That's very good.
Q: In the beginning and it the end when we were relaxed, there
was this space that if a thought occurred, I would relax and let
go, but I would notice it. And then when it was important to look
at the thoughts and a thought would arise, when I looked, the
thought would not be there. It's hard - the mind is either looking
or thinking.
Rinpoche: Okay. That's good.
Meditation Without Thoughts
When you are looking at thoughts, like this, and in particular
for beginners, there are two types of things that can happen.
Most people try to look at thoughts and don't see anything
happening. There is a gap that happens, but it only lasts for about
three or four seconds. Then another thought arises and we look at
it. As soon as we start looking at it, we don't see it anymore. It
goes back and forth in this way. A thought arises, we look at it,
and we don't see it anymore; a thought arises, we look at it, and
then we can't identify it. This is very good. It is just like
sitting here. If you are someone who has already received
pointing-out instructions on the essence of mind, this type of
practice is particularly beneficial.
The meditation during which we cannot see any thoughts becomes
shamatha without object. The meditation during which we can look at
thoughts becomes shamatha with object. Both of these are very good.
This is what happens to most people. For other people it is like
looking at a TV screen.
The example used to illustrate this is of an elderly person
watching two children who are very involved in what they're
playing. They might be crashing two trucks together, or they might
be building a house, or they might be playing video games, and
they're very involved and very excited. But the old person is able
to sit back and just laugh, no matter what is happening. Therefore,
we can look at the thoughts. When we look at thoughts this way
they're rendered powerless. It is like taking a snapshot of our
thoughts or zapping our thoughts in this way.
When we are doing this, it does not matter how many thoughts are
arising. If we can look at them, all of our thoughts become a
support for meditation.
When the hand is telling beads of a mala, it is going through
the beads one after the other in unbroken succession. We can do so
in a way in which we are mindful of each bead as it passes. In the
same way, when we are mindful of thoughts, it is impossible for us
to be mindful of just one thought and keep our attention on that
for any period of time, because the nature of thoughts is they come
one after the other, and one thought does not stay around. It's an
easy meditation, isn't it?
It is okay if we have thoughts; it is okay if we do not have
thoughts; and there is no state of mind we can experience that is
beyond these two - having thoughts or not having thoughts - so how
much easier can you get?
With our last meditation session, the instruction was to create
thoughts. But when we practice in the ordinary sense, there is no
particular need to create thoughts.
In meditation, one main point is to simply pay attention with
mindfulness. We do not need to identify what we are paying
attention to. It is the paying attention itself that is most
important.
When we continue practicing in this way, we begin with a sense
of duality, with a viewer and viewed, or a looker and object looked
at. As we become more and more familiar with the practice, the
viewer and the viewed will become the same thing. When that
happens, we are very close to seeing the essence of our mind.
During the shamatha audience this morning, one student asked if
it were possible for shamatha to turn into vipashyana, or insight,
without applying any particular effort. In most cases, the answer
is no. You would have to apply some other view, such as the view of
emptiness. But there is one situation where shamatha could change
into vipashana without bringing in any other technique. This is
that very instance.
Meditation With Negative Thoughts
As we said earlier, there are three main types of thoughts we
could have: negative, positive or neutral. For beginners on the
path there is a special method for working with negative
thoughts.
When we have negative emotions, such as strong anger or
aggression in our mind, the first thing is to recognize that "anger
has arisen in my mind."
At this stage we don't try to stop the anger, we simply
recognize it. So don't hit the other person right away. Look at the
anger not at your enemy.
For beginners, we chiefly look at the perceiving subject,
instead of the perceived object. That is the key point, that is the
key difference.
In this moment of anger, there is a mind thinking, "I want to
hit that person." There is a mind that feels uncomfortable and
painful and angry, all at the same time. So we look at that - we
look at that mind of anger and we place our mindfulness on it as
one-pointedly as we can.
This helps us to relate with our anger in the same way that
placing our attention on a toothache helps us to relate with the
toothache. It helps us to stop creating more pain for ourselves,
and the unbearable aspect of the anger becomes pacified. There is
still going to be a sense of anger or a sense of wrath, but the
unbearability and the uncomfortableness of it will be slowly
pacified as we use this as our object of meditation. As well, the
anger itself will become a support for our nondistraction. We can
apply this technique for other negative mental states too, such as
depression, fear or any other type of suffering.
Meditation With Neutral and Positive Thoughts
If we are working with neutral thoughts or positive thoughts, we
can look at both subject and object. For example, if you are
thinking, "I am going to go to downtown Halifax," you can look at
the object aspect of those thoughts. You can look at what buildings
appear in your mind, the streets, the lights, people coming and
going - all of that.
If you looked at all those images as they are arising in your
mind, it is the same thing as visualizing a deity in the creation
stage. It is the same thing as visualizing yourself as a deity
inside a palace and another deity in the sky in front of you. It is
also the same thing as taking refuge, and visualizing all the
objects of refuge in the sky in front.
What is the difference between thinking about going to downtown
Halifax and visualizing deities? The main difference is that there
is an aspect of pure appearance in the visualization of deities,
and there is none of that in just thinking about going to downtown
Halifax. But from the perspective of nondistraction and practicing
mindfulness, accomplishing shamatha or calm abiding, there is no
difference between the two. However, there is a separate benefit
from working with pure appearance rather than with just thinking
about Halifax.
If you ask yourself, "What is the difference between my usual
thinking about going to downtown Halifax, and thinking about it
with mindfulness," you're not aware of what you are thinking. You
are not aware of how you arrived in your thoughts at downtown
Halifax. There will not be any awareness of your thoughts of
getting in the car and driving down the road, and then finally
arriving in downtown Halifax. But if you have mindfulness, you will
be aware and have a recognition of each stage. You will know when
you entered the car and how it is that you are traveling.
If we keep meditating in that way, finally we will arrive at a
state where the object we are looking at and the looker become one,
and all of our mental afflictions - desire, aggression, jealousy,
and so on - will be self liberated. The power of our disturbing
emotions or mental afflictions (kleshas) will be gradually
diminished.
This has been an explanation of the sixth method of shamatha.
The main point of shamatha is to gain freedom over our mind, to tap
into the natural energy of our mind and tame the mind's wild
monkey. When we do that, we will become like a well-tamed
elephant.
They don't go about following their every whim or harming people
randomly. They walk with a purpose.
What do we do with this shamatha mind that is like a well-tamed
elephant? We put it to work on the path of liberation. In order to
join fully with the path of liberation, we need to join with the
practice of vipashyana or special-seeing, insight. Vipashyana is of
two types: the vipashyana of emptiness and the vipashyana of the
essence of mind. If emptiness and the essence of mind are joined
with shamatha we attain the state of Buddhahood. That's all. Are
there any questions?
Questions
Question: First, I would like to thank the Shambhala Centre for
affording me the opportunity to experience all four of your talks,
and to be able to experience your profound wisdom. "Thought thought
thought thought" - I have about a million of them, and I'm finding
them in questions, so be patient with me. I'll try to be very
brief. I've experienced so much wisdom and knowledge from you in
these last few days that I'm wondering, as a beginner, what would
you like me to leave with if you could tell me one thing?
Secondly, [to the translator] and I think you're a wonderful
interpreter, I know that with different languages sometimes it is
difficult to translate thoughts and phrases, and I'm wondering if
Rinpoche is feeling confident that you gave expressed [laughter]
everything. I don't blame you if you don't ask him! Like, is he
confident that you have expressed properly everything that people
wanted to be expressed?
And thirdly, he seems like such a calming person, I'm wondering
if he ever experiences "monkey-mind."
Rinpoche: So, as to your first question, in relation to the
talks on loving-kindness and compassion, the one point to keep in
mind is to benefit others with a sense of balance. In relation to
the meditation talks, mainly stay with shamatha without object.
Q: Okay.
Rinpoche [in English]: Good translator! I've been many places.
Some translators make things worse. Tyler is very direct and very
clear. Very good [applause].
Okay. Monkey-mind? Yes, I do have monkey mind.
Q: Thank God! Thank you.
Q: I was curious if Rinpoche believes that certain negative
emotions might hide themselves? And if so, how does one encourage
negative emotions, specifically anger, to come to your conscious
mind?
Rinpoche: The main thing is to try to get into the habit of
recognizing anger. Once you are able to do this, then slowly you
will be able to see it more and more clearly. For example, you
might experience anger and then only later be able to recognize
that you were feeling anger. You can take whatever moment it is
that you remember that and say, "Oh I was feeling anger back then"
and just appreciate that moment of recognition. Try to get into
that habit slowly in that way. There is anger that arose before
that you weren't aware of, and there is the moment of recognition
later on. When you have that moment of recognition, you can ask
yourself, "How did I feel back then when anger was arising, and how
do I feel now that I have recognized it?" You can take that as an
example - kind of inform yourself with that and then move forward
into this habit of recognition.
Q: If there is no arising is there no anger?
Rinpoche: If anger does not arise that does not mean that there
is no anger. Everyone has the root of anger present in them in a
dormant form. So there is obvious anger then there is dormant
anger. That seems to be what you're asking about. But the dormant
anger does not disappear until you attain what is called the first
bodhisattva bhumi. Until you first directly realize emptiness,
everyone has dormant anger, and you don't need to worry about
that.
Q: But it could take a while [laughter].
Rinpoche: A little while.
Q: Firstly, I would like to say thank you. Secondly, last night
you answered a question about the amount of time a beginner should
meditate or sit, and you said an hour. As the mother of a young
family, I think that was rather discouraging for me, that amount of
time. Thirdly, I have been practicing my spirituality as a
Christian for the better part of my life, and I have come to a part
of life where I feel that needs to change, but at the same time I
do not feel that I am finished with Christianity. So I feel
confused.
Rinpoche: With the example of one or two hours of meditation,
that is not necessarily how long you should have to meditate. That
recommendation was for those who are very serious about really
training in this meditation technique and have time. You could try
to do it for that long. But it is not saying that if you could do
it for an hour you will get the benefit, and if you don't do it for
an hour you do not get the benefit. You could start by doing
fifteen minutes of meditation, even one minute of meditation or
even five. If you do one minute of meditation then there is the
benefit of one minute of meditation. If you do an hour, then
there's the benefit of doing an hour. So you could begin by
meditating for fifteen minutes - there is a very good benefit to
doing that.
With regard to the second question about spiritual traditions,
you absolutely do not have to give up your old tradition at all to
practice these meditation techniques. It is completely fine to
maintain your practice of Christianity and still meditate by using
these Buddhist practices. Furthermore, you can bring some of your
Christian images into the practice of shamatha with object, as we
have been talking about. Instead of using a Buddhist figure as an
object of your focus you could, for example, use a cross as the
object of meditation and do shamatha with that. Sometimes in
Buddhist meditation we visualize Buddhas in the sky in front and do
shamatha with those objects. You could visualize Jesus and use that
as a support for shamatha. It is a question of personal preference
- I prefer Buddhist view and meditation techniques and Buddhist
teachings as a spiritual path, but that does not necessarily mean
that this is what everyone wants. It is up to each individual.
Q: I feel that it is time to move on spiritually and learn about
other things. That is where the confusion lies. I've learned about
Christianity, not that I'm any expert, but as well I feel it's time
to learn about another spiritual ...
Rinpoche: What to do will depend on your own feelings. Examine
them and examine what your desires are in that regard. People may
have a lot of questions about their old religious tradition. They
might start thinking that some things are untenable or do not make
sense to them. Then they might encounter something new and have a
sense of coming home. They might think, "This is really making
sense to me. I feel like I am coming home with this." If that
happens then it is fine to go with that new tradition. You can
examine for yourself how you feel.
Q: Rinpoche, I was a bit distracted by a negative thought when
you gave the instruction on the technique for working with negative
thoughts. So I wonder if you could go over that again, and perhaps
expand a little bit on the part about working with the subject
rather than the object.
Rinpoche: What's your practice level in the Buddhist
curriculum?
Q: Sadhaka.
Rinpoche: You can refer to the teachings on the Three Words
that Strike the Vital Point. Listen to the tapes and read the
text. The basic point here is that even negative thoughts can
become the support for mindfulness. When you look at them they
become the support for mindfulness and the support for
nondistraction, just like concentrating on a form or listening to a
sound. To further clarify this, you can listen to the tape of
tonight's talk.
Q: Thank you.
Q: Hi. I am actually in a Buddhism class at Dalhousie University
[in Halifax], and I have an exam tomorrow [laughter]. There has
been considerable debate in my class over the nature of
impermanence. There are certain students in my class who seem to
feel that Buddhist doctrine in its own essence contradicts itself
because they are saying that everything is impermanent. But then
our professor also taught about the state of nirvana, and
enlightenment being a permanent thing. That's where they are
feeling the confusion and the contradiction: If everything is
impermanent, how can the state of enlightenment be permanent? I'm
just wondering what you think, and if you yourself believe that the
state of nirvana to be permanent.
Rinpoche: This seeming contradiction of enlightenment or nirvana
being permanent on the one hand, and all apparent reality being
impermanent on the other, actually is not a contradiction.
Seeing them as a contradiction is a case of mixing the way things
appear with the way things are. In other words, the
way things appear is the relative truth, and the way
things are is the ultimate truth.
When we refer to the true nature of reality, that is a synonym
for Buddhahood. Buddhahood is the true nature of everything - the
true nature of all sentient beings, the true nature of Buddhas -
and the true nature of sentient beings is enlightenment. It
is nirvana, ultimate reality. It is said to be permanent
because it is free from arising - it never came into being and it
never will go out of being. Something that is devoid of arising can
never be said to be impermanent, because to be impermanent,
something has to go through the stages of arising, abiding and
ceasing - arising in the beginning, abiding in the middle, and
ceasing in the end. The ultimate nature, the true nature of things,
never arose so it can not be permanent. But as long as something
arose, then it is necessarily impermanent. That refers to all
phenomena of relative truth, or apparent reality, the way things
appear. From the perspective of the way things appear, everything
arises, abides and ceases. As soon as something comes into being,
it is marked by the quality of impermanence. It has to abide and
then it has to cease. But on the other side, ultimate reality,
there is no such impermanence because there is no arising. You
can't call it permanent either because if there is no impermanence,
there cannot be permanence.
Nevertheless, it is sometimes called the permanence that is
beyond impermanence and permanence.
Q: If Buddhahood can never arise, how does one become
enlightened, or how does one transcend from the relative?
Rinpoche: We go back to the distinction between the way things
appear and the way things are. Buddhahood, or the
state of enlightenment, is actually the way things are, the
way we are ultimately. But from the perspective of the way things
appear, we appear as confused sentient beings. The way we
appear is not really the way we are. So when we attain Buddhahood,
when we recognize the way we really are, the way things
appear and the way things are become the same
thing.
Q: Thank you.
Conclusion
Rinpoche: We'll conclude at this point.
I have received some requests to say a few words about Khenpo
Jigme Phuntsok. Khenpo Jigme Phuntsok was a great lama, a great
teacher and a great practitioner. He was mainly a Nyingma
practitioner, but he also practiced Kagyü lineage practices. He
also was a tertön, a treasure discoverer. In particular, he was a
great siddha, a mahasiddha. Khenpo Jigme Phuntsok would fill an
entire valley in Tibet with people and give teachings to gatherings
of upwards of fifteen thousand people - ten thousand monastic monks
and nuns, and five or six thousand lay people. The people would
create a little city by building earth houses to stay in along the
sides of hills on both sides of the valley, and then gather
together under a huge tent to hear Jigme Phuntsok's teachings. He
would teach all day long.
From the perspective of the students it was never a very
elaborate situation. Basically they studied the dharma and
meditated together. They did not have much to eat or fancy clothes
to wear or anything like that. Nevertheless, Jigme Khenpo Phuntsok
produced a lot of master scholars (khenpos) from these
gatherings. He also produced a lot of master practitioners from
amongst the monks and nuns. On that very ground there were two
monastic colleges (shedras) - one Kagyü and one Nyingma.
Sometimes Jigme Phuntsok would give teachings to his students, and
at the same time he would take them to a place where he would
discover treasure teachings (terma), which he would reveal
in front of everyone.
There are two khenpos at Sherab Ling monastery, my primary
residence in India, both of whom came from this place in Tibet
where they studied with Khenpo Jigme Phuntsok. Khenpo Jigme
Phuntsok passed away two or three weeks ago. Everything is
impermanent. Right?
I have been very delighted to be able to come to Halifax for a
few days to talk about the dharma with you, and am very happy that
you have listened with such enthusiasm and interest. In particular,
I'm very pleased with the way the vajrayana students listened to
the teachings, and have a good feeling that you have understood the
material. The shamatha talks and audiences also were very good. So
thank you to everyone, especially to all who were involved in the
preparation and coordination of the program. Everything was done
excellently. When I was going down the stairs, there always was
someone there ready to support me. There was someone ready to open
the door and help me with my seat. It was just like being a king.
I've never been treated that way before. Also thank you to everyone
who works at this center.
I greatly appreciate the stages that have been laid forth by
Trungpa Rinpoche - how to practice and study on the path. They are
very good stages, and it makes me very happy that you are all
practicing them.
Richard John [Director of Halifax Shambhala Center]: Rinpoche,
you know by now how we all feel about you. We have benefited
tremendously from your wisdom and clarity. It is extraordinary how
you have been able to inspire all of us from beginners to
dinosaurs, so we are tremendously grateful and very moved to be
able to study with you. I would like to offer a token of our
appreciation to you. There is an extra little package for you - a
copy of Shambhala: Sacred Path of the Warrior [by Chögyam
Trungpa], which is one of our very favorite books. Tyler, Rinpoche
wants you to read this book to him.
Rinpoche: Thank you.
RJ: Lama Chhewang, it has been delightful to have you with us
here. Tyler, thank you again. Superb translator. You're getting
more creative too. Are you really from Truro [a small town near
Halifax]? [Laughter and applause].
Rinpoche [in English]: Thank you very much, Translator!
RJ: Many many people have made the obvious request for Rinpoche
to come back to Halifax often. I presented this request to him
formally before the talk tonight, and I am very pleased, with your
permission Rinpoche, to tell everyone that you will be back next
year and the year after that.
[Dedications of Merit and singing of the Shambhala
Anthem.]
|